Showing posts with label information. Show all posts
Showing posts with label information. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

New Firefox knows where you live !!!

· 0 comments

 

The all new Firefox v. 3.5 is finally out for download … with lots of new features and enhancements … but the feature i am talking about is … embedded Google technology called .. Geo-location … so , now new firefox browser can know your geographical location from your IP !!! …

I don’t know about others out there , but for me , i sure don’t like this feature .. ( i am not paranoid about my identification but still i don’t like this feature ) … so , i do very little reading about it … and found that its easy to disable this feature ( lucky for me that i am not alone to think this feature is invasion on privacy just same like google do every time we use google search  or any of its services ) …

to disable this feature … just type …

about:config

in browser address bar … and it will show warning page indicating that , now firefox warranty will expire if we change this options !!! ( i never had any idea that softwares DO COME with warranty ) … just say OK … and in FILTER … just type GEO , it will list all strings starts with GEO … just locate ..

geo.enabled

.. and make it FALSE …

 

geo_location

and you are done with it …

 

enjoy …

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Darpa to take humans out of network management

· 0 comments

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) is researching computer networks that can organise and run themselves without human intervention, and dramatically increase available radio spectrum.

The organisation has been outlining its research goals to Congress in its 2009 Strategic Plan (PDF). One area is the design of a network infrastructure that can configure and maintain itself. It is initially intended for linking participants in battle, but could also have civilian uses.

"At the core of this concept are robust, secure and self-forming networks. These networks must be at least as reliable, available, secure and survivable as the weapons and forces they connect. They must distribute huge amounts of data quickly and precisely," says the report.

"But in order for these networks to realise their full potential, they must form, manage, defend and heal themselves, so they always function at the enormously high speeds that provide their advantages. This means that people can no longer be central to establishing, managing and administering them."

Some of the systems are in a very advanced stage, the agency reports. The Network Centric Radio System is already in operation, and can set up a self-healing ad hoc network gateway to link radio and network communications systems.

Darpa is also funding research into how to use existing spectrum more efficiently. Its neXt Generation Communications technology is being used to allocate spectrum dynamically, so that devices can use spectrum assigned to other uses when it is not being used. Tests have shown a tenfold increase in spectrum efficiency using this method.

from VUnet …

Njoy …

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

The Impact of Computing : 78% More Each Year

· 0 comments

Anyone who follows technology is familiar with Moore's Law and its many variations, and has come to expect the price of computing power to halve every 18 months.  But many people don't see the true long-term impact of this beyond the need to upgrade their computer every three or four years.  To not internalize this more deeply is to miss investment opportunities, grossly mispredict the future, and be utterly unprepared for massive, sweeping changes to human society.

Today, we will introduce another layer to the concept of Moore's Law-type exponential improvement.  Consider that on top of the 18-month doubling times of both computational power and storage capacity (an annual improvement rate of 59%), both of these industries have grown by an average of approximately 15% a year for the last fifty years.  Individual years have ranged between +30% and -12%, but let's say these industries have grown large enough that their growth rate slows down to an average of 12% a year for the next couple of decades.

So, we can crudely conclude that a dollar gets 59% more power each year, and 12% more dollars are absorbed by such exponentially growing technology each year.  If we combine the two growth rates to estimate the rate of technology diffusion simultaneously with exponential improvement, we get (1.59)(1.12) = 1.78.

The Impact of Computing grows at a screaming rate of 78% a year.

Sure, this is a very imperfect method of measuring technology diffusion, but many visible examples of this surging wave present themselves.  Consider the most popular television shows of the 1970s, such as The Brady Bunch or The Jeffersons, where the characters had virtually all the household furnishings and electrical appliances that are common today, except for anything with computational capacity.  Yet, economic growth has averaged 3.5% a year since that time, nearly doubling the standard of living in the United States since 1970.  It is obvious what has changed during this period, to induce the economic gains.

In the 1970s, there was virtually no household product with a semiconductor component.  Even digital calculators were not affordable to the average household until very late in the decade.

In the 1980s, many people bought basic game consoles like the Atari 2600, had digital calculators, and purchased their first VCR, but only a fraction of the VCR's internals, maybe 20%, comprised of exponentially deflating semiconductors, so VCR prices did not drop that much per year.

In the early 1990s, many people began to have home PCs.  For the first time, a major, essential home device was pegged to the curve of 18-month halving in cost per unit of power.

In the late 1990s, the PC was joined by the Internet connection and the DVD player, bringing the number of household devices on the Moore's Law-type curve to three.

Today, many homes also have a wireless router, a cellular phone, an iPod, a flat-panel TV, a digital camera, and a couple more PCs.  In 2006, a typical home may have as many as 8 or 9 devices which are expected to have descendants that are twice as powerful for the same price, in just the next 12 to 24 months.

To summarize, the number of devices in an average home that are on this curve, by decade :

1960s and earlier : 0

1970s : 0

1980s : 1-2

1990s : 3-4

2000s : 6-12

If this doesn't persuade people of the exponentially accelerating penetration of information technology, then nothing can.

One extraordinary product provides a useful example, the iPod :

First Generation iPod, released October 2001, 5 GB capacity for $399

Fifth Generation iPod, released October 2005, 60 GB capacity for $399, or 12X more capacity in four years, for the same price.

Total iPods sold in 2002 : 381,000

Total iPods sold in 2005 : 22,497,000, or 59 times more than 2002.

12X the capacity, yet 59X the units, so (12 x 59) = 708 times the impact in just three years.  The rate of iPod sales growth will moderate, of course, but another product will simply take up the baton, and have a similar growth in impact.

Now, we have a trend to project into the near future.  It is a safe prediction that by 2015, the average home will contain 25-30 such computationally advanced devices, including sophisticated safety and navigation systems in cars, multiple thin HDTVs greater than 60 inches wide diagonally, networked storage that can house over 1000 HD movies in a tiny volume, virtual-reality ready goggles and gloves for advanced gaming, microchips and sensors embedded into several articles of clothing, and a few robots to perform simple household chores.

Not only does Moore's Law ensure that these devices are over 100 times more advanced than their predecessors today, but there are many more of them in number.  This is the true vision of the Impact of Computing, and the shocking, accelerating pace at which our world is being reshaped.

I will expand on this topic greatly in the near future.  In the meantime, some food for thought :

Visualizing Moore's Law is easy when viewing the history of video games.

The Law of Accelerating Returns is the most important thing a person could read.

How semiconductors are becoming a larger share of the total economy.

Economic Growth is Exponential and Accelerating, primarily due to information technology becoming all-encompassing.

from The Futurist …

Njoy …

Sunday, May 10, 2009

Black Holes of Internet !!!

· 0 comments

There are plenty of places online that you would do well to steer clear of. A brief visit to some unsavoury websites, for instance, could leave your computer infected with worms or viruses. Then there are the "black holes" to worry about.

If your emails mysteriously disappear, or your favorite website is suddenly unobtainable, you might have run into one. Though nowhere near as destructive as their cosmological cousins, information black holes can create all kinds of problems for surfers. Essentially they are points on the network at which data packets simply disappear due to broken connections, say, or misconfigured routers - devices that maintain lists of addresses and which help direct internet traffic. A team including computer scientist Ethan Katz-Bassett at the University of Washington in Seattle has detected almost 1.5 million black holes since it began looking in 2007. The majority persist for over 2 hours, he says. Unfortunately it is tough to predict where they will appear next, so it's hard for the average surfer to avoid them.

Far easier to avoid are a kind of online chatroom called Internet Relay Chat channels. Though the majority are legitimate, a few IRC channels have a very dark reputation, and are run as open markets for stolen goods. One 2007 survey found $37 million worth of illegal stuff in IRC channels, including 80,000 credit card numbers and bank account details. And if that is not bad enough, some of these chatrooms are also used by hackers to send commands to their networks of malicious software bots, or botnets. When a PC is infected by a virus or malicious software it may be hijacked and used as part of a botnet to launch spam or cyber-attacks elsewhere.

Then there are significant pockets of cyberspace - some 5 per cent of all internet addresses - that are not fully connected to the rest of the net. Dubbed the "dark internet", they are often the result of faulty routers or networks with strict security policies that block traffic.

Amongst these dark regions are blocks of seemingly unused internet addresses that may suddenly and briefly flare into activity. Although this behavior might have an innocent explanation, it can also hint at dubious activities.

A three-year study by online security consultants Arbor Networks revealed that dark internet addresses can be a source of cyber-attacks and junk email. The study suggests that hackers or spammers hijack routers and use them to create false addresses which are left dormant until the hackers bring them to life to facilitate their nefarious ends. These dark addresses seem to be multiplying in proportion to the growth of the net, says Arbor Networks' Craig Labovitz.

from New Scientist ..

Njoy …

Friday, May 8, 2009

Hiding Identity under the Onion … How To of TOR software

· 0 comments

 

Just like i said before … Tor is really good application … in this post i will show how this thing works and anonymize our identity on internet !!!

first all you need is to download the TOR from TOR project website … i chose , the 2nd option, “ Tor Browser Bundle for Windows (Contains Tor, Vidalia, Torbutton, Polipo, and Firefox) “ … its 0.2.1.14-rc … they says its UNSTABLE so … may give unexpected results or may be it will not make you much “anonymous” around the internet but i really don’t know the actual reason .. sigh … i use this version because , NO NEED TO INSTALL or SETUP anything and its PORTABLE …

once you download it , extract it on a usb drive ( if you are planning to use it on any other pc )or in any folder of computer ( to use only in that machine ) …

image

now , simply double click on that Vidalia icon … it will run the script and automatically

image

once connected to Tor network , it will launch Tor’s old buddy …. the Firefox … you can make sure that you are connected by viewing , the Vidalia control panel , which shows CONNECTED TO THE TOR NETWORK message with green onion …

 image

 

as it will launch FF, you will see the welcome message just like above ( ofcouse IP will be different ) … just remember to NOT TO CLOSE FIREFOX , because it will automatically exit TOR … ( i think you can change that option ) …

 

image

 

the thing is , i was using google’s chrome too , now see when is check the website … www.whatismyip.com …

 

image 

the chrome shows my real IP , but the TORed firefox shows the IP that others will SEE when i use TOR … hmm …thats TORrific .. right ??

and if you ever wonder what is the route to that IP from ur IP , and how you are anonymized … just try to see the routing path of TOR … it shows TOR NETWORK MAP … as you know TOR uses onion routing , so after passing through these much number of nodes … its really hard to find your real IP ( that’s the best part ) … !!!

1124170844-1

and the thing is , i am sitting in public library which has restricted access to sites and can’t access to youtube ( no offence ) … but i really like to watch cartoons on it … so before i can’t use it because it has been blocked by firewall and filters … but now ?? … nothing is between me and my favorite show ( expect my g/f .. hehehe ) …

so that is the way how can you anonymize your identity on internet using tor … but you need to remember that TOR is all free , open to public and non profit thing , so may be you won’t feel glitch when you surf the internet , but you will feel a bit leggy performance when you watch video on youtube …and about security , TOR CAN NOT secure your connection outside the TOR network , means hacker sitting at the end of exit node can intercept / sniff your packets and crack your password  ( for security, TOR recommends SSL connection between End to End Connection )…  also , many times the search results are different then what you expected or language is different … this is because , now you have IP of another geographic location , the search engine  thinks you are from that place so it will display results according to it ( its good if you surf porn sites a lot , because they will not get your real location ….. huh, wait a minute … do you really want it  ??? ) …

 

fingerscrossedNjoy …

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Windows 7 RC goes public …

· 0 comments

 

Just like they have said in their windows blog … the Latest Operating System from microsoft … Windows 7 … is available to public … but this time , its Release Candidate version …. v. 7100 … which means , its better then beta … and most of this will come as it is in final version of windows 7 ….

dwhiuuyd7c7glv6w6my

This RC version is available to download till JULY,and  will expire on 1st of June 2010 … to download it you need to have account with any of microsoft services … and product key will be given at time of downloading …

 

Njoy … fingerscrossed

Monday, May 4, 2009

Hiding Identity under the Onion !!!

· 0 comments

 tor_sticker

Vidalia … a sweet onion , great in taste indeed and better choice for eating raw compared to other breeds … but the vidalia onion i am talking about is something different … its the TOR Project , which has symbol of vidalia onion, because it uses onion routing concept … Tor is a software , which allows user to surf internet anonymously …

Logic behind the Onion …

Onion routing is a technique for anonymous communication over a computer network. Messages are repeatedly encrypted and then sent through several network nodes called onion routers. Each onion router removes a layer of encryption to uncover routing instructions, and sends the message to the next router where this is repeated. This prevents these intermediary nodes from knowing the origin, destination, and contents of the message. Here, volunteers provide their network node ( at their expense of bandwidth and $$$ ofcourse ) …

But Tor is not the magic wend of fairy god-mother that will make user completely anonymous on internet … it has its own limitation and rules … it does not guarantee for security of data transmitted , once it leaves tor network … so to ensure end-to-end security, measures need to be taken ( SSL connection for example ) … because it has been already proved that , a user ( a hacker , to be more precise )  sitting at end node of network can sniff / capture data leaving tor network and can use it too …

onionroutingfig7

But if you are an adventurer just like me … who just want to try tor for study and experiment … then its really amazing …

the tor software which runs from usb drive gives you ultra portability , ease of use … you don’t even need to install anything in pc … and more good , we can use it anywhere …  is just amazing …

i want to write about  it but some another time …

history about tor …

tor official site …

till then …

Njoy … fingerscrossed

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Hide your tracks at work ???

· 0 comments

 

We all spend some of our time at work doing things that have nothing to do with our job. We surf the Web. We play games. Sure, we all need our downtime, and the enlightened manager knows that. But still, we'd rather just surf in private than deal with the raised eyebrows.

That's why we need ways to ensure that when our boss surprises us or sneaks up behind us, she'll think that we're actually working. Here's a list of apps and services that help.

Camouflaged Web services

SpreadTweet If you're a Twitter fanatic, try SpreadTweet. The software hides your Twitter stream in what looks like an Excel window. It displays everything in plain text to make it look like a real spreadsheet. It's sure to fool any boss.

1cup1coffee 1cup1coffee looks like a Windows Explorer pane (so don't use it on a Mac), but all those Word documents and Powerpoint presentations are actually a collection of Flash games. 1cup1coffeeSimply click on one of the "files" and you can play a game in what looks like your Windows Explorer window. If you hear your boss, you can hit the back button and you'll be brought back to the file listing.

Anonymizer If you don't want the IT folks to know what you're up to, spend $30 and get Anonymizer. The software redirects your Web traffic through its servers to not only safeguard your IP from outside sources, but also to get your employer's IT people off your trail.

C.H.I.M.P. Rearview Monitor Mirror chimpWhile playing a game or doing something you shouldn't, just glance up at the C.H.I.M.P. Rearview Monitor Mirror to see if your boss is approaching from behind. The mirror won't hide what you're doing, but it will give you some time to switch to something more appropriate. And in case you're wondering, C.H.I.M.P. stands for Chimp Has Invincible Monkey Powers. Yeah, I don't get it either. But it is worth the $6.99 price tag.

Don's Boss Page Don's Boss Page (no relation) is full of great boss trickery. If you want to aimlessly browse the Web, but make it sound like you're working, you can keep clicking the site's keyboard audio clips to make others think you're typing.

Quick tip: Resize your windows When I was an accountant, I used Outlook. To make everyone think I was so engrossed in my e-mail, I resized Firefox to fit perfectly in the Outlook preview pane. Anyone who walked by thought I was just reading an e-mail. If they ever got too close, I'd switch to another message. It worked beautifully.

Don't Panic 1.2 If you don't want to get busted by the boss, try installing Don't Panic 1.2 onto your Windows machine. The software will allow you to minimize multiple windows at the same time. You can also maximize multiple windows simultaneously to ensure your boss will be happy when they walk by.

Or just use keyboard shortcuts Brush up on your knowledge of keyboard shortcuts. Whenever you hear someone coming, you can quickly drop a few keys and you'll immediately look like you're working.  

StealthSwitch You'll have to pay $40 to get it, but StealthSwitch is worth the price -- until your boss finds it. Once connected to your computer via USB, StealthSwitch sits on the floor. While playing a game or doing something you shouldn't at work, you can quickly tap the StealthSwitch when you hear your boss approaching. It immediately makes the current window invisible and brings you back to a window that's related to your work. Once your boss walks away, you can tap the StealthSwitch again to get back to your game.

panicbuttonThe Last ( and my fav. too smile_tongue)  $25 USB Panic Button is similar, if you're quicker with your hands than your mouse and don't mind a garish missile-launch control button sitting on your desk. Simply push the plastic covering up, press the red button, and the tool will automatically change the screen on your computer to a spreadsheet, your favorite picture, your company's Web site, or anything else you set it to switch to.

from CNET …

Njoy … (your work) … fingerscrossed

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

What is Social Media ???

· 0 comments

 

Definition from Wikipedia:

Social media are primarily Internet-based tools for sharing and discussing information among human beings. Social media is information content created by people using highly accessible and scalable publishing technologies. It is intended to facilitate communications, influence interaction between peers and with public audiences.

DetectorPRO opinion of social media:
I don’t think Social Media has to be an object or a tool. I think Social Media transpires anytime a conversation happens: talking to a friend at a coffee shop, standing on a soap box in the park, or even just walking around the city talking to random people.
Social Media is about the interaction, but we try to manage it through the tools.
And, a bit simpler: Social media is any online space where people have public conversations.

Social media humor:
But, if you browser looks like following picture you may consider yourself as a big social media person (as my colleague used to say: socialist), or at the other hand - you must go outside in the real world and socialize with real people FAST.

 

 

terrible-firefox

 

from DetectorPro …

Njoy … fingerscrossed

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Are we really ready for Cloud ??

· 0 comments

cloud-computing-kitchen-sink

All the data that make up our lives seem to be heading for the clouds. From photos on Flickr to memos on Google Docs, we are entrusting more and more to computers in giant data centers—a model called cloud computing. It's certainly convenient to have access to our stuff wherever we are and on whatever device we choose. But is it safe?

There are two kinds of risks in putting your data online. One is that you can never be quite sure who has access to your information once it has migrated beyond the hard drives and backup storage devices in your home. The other risk is that the information, and sometimes the applications you need to make use of it, may be available only when you are connected to the Internet and the service is up and running. These twin dangers are now abundantly obvious to users of a collaborative Web-based word-processing program called Google Docs. Google recently notified its users that a software glitch had allowed some subscribers unauthorized access to "a very small percentage" of these documents, which are stored on Google's servers.

The security of data stored in the cloud varies with both the design of the system and how well the safety measures are implemented. Some services encrypt information both in transit and in storage in such a way that only the owner can decrypt it. These services are generally the most secure against either accidental or malicious disclosure—though your information can be lost forever if you lose the password. In general, services that allow Web access to data from any computer are riskier than more restrictive systems, and those that allow the information to be shared among a group of users pose even greater hazards.

Sometimes you have control over this—for example, by declining an option that lets you access your data from a Web site. This choice is available on many online backup services and can be handy if, say, you are on the road and need to get a file that's on your home or business computer. But clearly that access increases the risk that your information could be exposed to third parties.

The security practices of cloud storage systems are usually described in the fine print of their security and privacy policies, but in practice it's difficult to assess safety. Corporations run security audits to gauge the practices of cloud computing operations, but this is beyond the reach of individuals or smaller businesses. The simpler course for most of us is to think before committing data to the cloud. Those photos from the family trip to Disney World ? No problem. But the term sheet for a proposed merger or acquisition should probably stay encrypted on a hard drive that you control. Anything in between? Just consider how much embarrassment or trouble it would cause in the wrong hands.

The issues of getting to your online data are less serious. The growing ubiquity of wireless services means there are fewer and fewer places where you can't get on the Net if you need to. Wi-Fi is even slowly creeping onto airplanes, the last wireless frontier.

Will your cloud service be there when you need it? Google got a lot of unwelcome attention recently when its Gmail service was unavailable for about three hours. Back in the days of the Ma Bell monopoly, AT&T promised 99.999% availability, which allowed a bit over five minutes of downtime a year. But "five nines" of reliability is fabulously expensive. Google promises its corporate Google Apps customers 99.9% uptime, which leaves room for outages of nearly nine hours a year. The fact is, most enterprises don't deliver higher reliability on their own systems; the difference is that outages on big public services get publicity.

Ultimately, putting your data in the cloud involves choosing convenience and productivity at the cost of some security risk. In the real world, convenience almost always wins, and there's nothing wrong with that. What's important is that you understand the dangers.

from BusinessWeek …

Njoy …fingerscrossed

Friday, April 3, 2009

EVERY LINK YOU CLICK IS DANGEROUS !!!!

· 0 comments

 

internet-marketing

Well , title seems to be a bit more paranoidal … i should say …. every link you click can be dangerous ??? or simply … don’t click randomly ??? …. what ever it is … but the essence of the story is as follows …. from one of my fav. sites ….

Magic tricks are all about suggestion, psychology, misdirection and showmanship (see Tricks of the Mind), or as Cutter perhaps will say, every magic trick has tree parts: the pledge (where the magician shows you something ordinary), the turn (where the ordinary becomes something extraordinary), and the prestige (where the extraordinary turns into something you have never seen before).

In a similar way, real world information security breaches are combination of the characteristics you will often find in the performance of skillful magicians. Therefore, allow me introduce you to a simplistic form of an attack, perhaps so simple that in fact it may work far more often than we would like to admit, which skillfully uses suggestion, psychology, misdirection and a great doze of showmanship.

So, we’ve all heard of clickjacking and we know that it is a design bug and therefore it is very hard to deal with. However, are there other flawed areas of modern browsers design which can be abused? Of course there are. It just takes time to find them all because they are often well hidden underneath our common believes, ignorance and prejudice. Here is some code

<html> <body>

<script>

function clickme() {

var w = window.open('http://www.google.com');

setTimeout(function () { w.location = 'http://www.gnucitizen.org'; }, 5000); }

</script>

<input type="button" value="click me" onclick="clickme(this)"/> </body> </html>

 

Quite boring! I agree. First of all the user clicks on a button/link. Then a new tab/window opens which loads the content of http://www.google.com. Five seconds later, the newly created tab is preloaded with the content of http://www.gnucitizen.org. Do you find this code disturbing? I do. It is disturbing because it breaks the trust relationship that is going on between the user and google.com in this specific example. Call it surfjacking, framejacking,tabjacking or whatever you want to call it, but at the end of the day, I believe that this is just yet another form of bad design.

Here is another example. You browse the web, you click to digg a story, you get redirected to digg.com to login. SSL looks fine. The browser lights up all green. It is OK to type your username/password and you do. In the background, the page which initially took you to digg.com waits for you to login. It subsequently queries the digg.com login page for changes in the DOM structure by using script tags and error handlers to capture different error code offsets (check AttackAPI), and as such it tries to detect when you are fully logged on. It does these checks every half a second. Once a successful login is detected, it simply fires w.location = "some evil url here"; which will force the browser to render something else, perhaps something malicious, instead of the page that should have came after a successful authentication. Perhaps, the evil caller could even fire just a simple alert('Hey there!'); message as a form of misdirection and than return back the control with another w.focus().

Would you check the address bar again? Perhaps not, because the page which was forced onto you now contains similarly looking digg.com login page accompanied with some red and quite scary looking text which tells you that your login was unsuccessful. This is the psychology. The attacker uses the red color to distract your from the address bar so that you put all of your attention into the login form. You cannot escape your instincts. The forms screams at you that all you have to do is to fill in your username and password and everything will be fine again. You rush to fill in your credentials again. Your request is recorded. A 302 redirect fires back and the browser redirects you to your digg.com account like nothing has ever happened. This is the prestige.

As far as I know, although I might be wrong, this form of an attack is new. It is definitely not devastating and it wont break the Web. However, my honest opinion is that it does break a lot of things. For example, it breaks the user’s normal surfing experience. The good news is that there is an easy fix. Simply put, do not allow pages to redirect windows which are preloaded with content from a different origin! We fix this, we save the Web again.

from GNU Citizen …

Njoy … fingerscrossed

Monday, March 2, 2009

Netbooks … Sale Decliners of Micro$oft !!!

· 0 comments

 

299_microsfot

When Microsoft laid off 5,000 people in January, analysts and pundits pointed to plenty of reasons for the first major layoffs in the company’s history. The obvious culprits included the overall economic meltdown, Apple’s continued success and Wall Street’s desire to see a leaner Microsoft.

But the real cause of the layoffs can be summed up in a single word: netbooks. These lightweight, stripped-down laptops that sell for between $200 and $400 have taken a big chunk out of Microsoft’s bottom line. Unless the company comes up with a plan to handle them, its revenue will stagnate. In announcing the layoffs, Microsoft said that its revenue had increased an anemic 1.6 per cent in the quarter that ended 31 December compared to the same quarter a year earlier.

But that number doesn’t tell the whole story. Windows took the biggest hit, while systems for servers and related tools had hefty increases in sales. Windows sales were down an eye-popping 8 percent; server and related revenue grew 15 per cent. Microsoft clearly blames netbooks for the drop in Windows sales. Here’s what it said in its statement: “Client revenue declined 8 per cent as a result of PC market weakness and a continued shift to lower priced netbooks.” Netbooks have become the only bright spot for PC makers, with sales accelerating while the rest of the PC market stays in the doldrums. According to IDC, 10 million netbooks were sold in 2008 and that number should double to 20 million in 2009.

Why is all this bad news for Microsoft? First, an estimated 30 per cent of all netbooks ship with Linux. That means Microsoft doesn’t get a penny for Windows from 30 per cent of all netbooks being sold. Given that netbooks represent the fastest-growing PC market segment, the company’s problem may get worse with time. In addition, netbook owners who buy Linux machines won’t be buying Microsoft Office, handing Microsoft an additional revenue hit for every Linux netbook sold.

So it’s not surprising that in the most recent quarter, sales of Office were anemic. Overall, sales for Microsoft’s business division, which is in charge of Office, were up slightly, at 1.9 percent. But sales of the consumer version of Office plummeted 23 per cent—and consumers are the people buying netbook.

Microsoft faces other netbook-related woes as well. The company doesn’t get paid as much for a version of Windows sold on a netbook as it does for a version of Windows sold on a laptop or desktop PC. There’s very little margin on a machine selling for $200 to $400, and so Microsoft simply can’t charge full freight for Windows on one. And given the price that Microsoft charges for consumer versions of Office - usually about $200 for the lowest-priced version – netbook owners who use Windows aren’t likely to pay for Office either. It doesn’t make much sense to pay as much for a piece of software as you did for your entire PC. Microsoft clearly recognizes the problem and is taking action to try to solve it. First, it built windows 7 to run on netbook, something that Vista doesn’t do. When windows 7 ships, expect Microsoft to spend plenty of money promoting it for use on netbook, in an attempt to drastically cut into Linux sales.

In addition, Microsoft is working on low-cost, ad-supported, Web-based versions of Office. That way, it can start to get Office revenue from netbook owners. Will these steps be enough to make up for the overall shortfall in revenue caused by netbooks? Probably not. That’s why the company is desperate to figure out a way to make its online businesses succeed. If it can’t, the days of big revenue growth are behind Microsoft, thanks in part to netbooks.

from Macworld !!!

Njoy … fingerscrossed

Friday, February 13, 2009

“Fix It” … from Microsoft

· 0 comments

 

It has been always difficult to find help using standard help documents that we get with our Windows … right ?? … even sometimes it is more difficult to find help document on M$ website too … so most of time people like me prefer to ask google then microsoft .. right ?? smile_zipit

Over the past six weeks, Microsoft has quietly added a "Fix it" button to a few of the thousands of help documents on its Web site. When clicked, the computer then takes all the recommended steps automatically.

"If we know what those 15 steps are why shouldn't we just script it," said Lori Brownell, Microsoft's general manager of product quality and online support

The "Fix it" option is still fairly rare, showing up in around 100 different help documents. The effort is growing rapidly, though, up from just four such fixes when the program quietly began in December.

Microsoft continues to offer users the option of doing things on their own if they either don't trust Microsoft or just like being in control.

"We're not trying to hide anything," she said.

The first fixes included a number of common issues, including restoring a missing Internet Explorer icon to the desktop, how to enable the DVD library in Vista's Windows Media Center as well as what to do when encountering the error message in Street & Trips 2008 that "Construction information for routes could not be downloaded"

For now, Microsoft is having to go back and search its archives to see which of its problem solving tips can be automated. Eventually, it hopes to create the automated fixes at the same time the help articles are created.

Where it can, Microsoft is also adding the "Fix it" option into the error reporting tool built into Windows. Initially, all users could do when a program crashed was send a report to Microsoft. More recently, the system has started checking to see if there is any information on the issue. Next up, said Brownell, is offering the option to have the issue solved automatically.

another one example can be action center of windows 7 … which pinpoints and fixes issues that it can fix regarding security and maintenance issues with operating system.

Njoy … fingerscrossed

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Nearly Half the Hard Drives on EBay Hold Personal Data !!!

· 0 comments

 

ebay

 

EBay … one of my favorite place to buy computer junk online with good price and options … just like many people around the world …

Recently a New York computer forensics firm found that 40% of the hard disk drives it recently purchased in bulk orders from eBay contained personal, private and sensitive information -- everything from corporate financial data to the Web-surfing history and downloads of a man with a foot fetish.

Kessler International conducted the survey over a six-month period, buying up disk drives from the United States and Canada ranging in size from 40GB to 300GB. The firm, which completed its survey about two weeks ago, bought a total of 100 relatively modern drives, the vast majority of them serial ATA.

"With size of the sample, I guess we were surprised with the percentage of disks that we found data on," said Michael Kessler, CEO of Kessler International. "We expected most of the drives to be wiped -- to find one or two disks with data. But 40 drives out of 100 is a lot."

While Kessler's engineers had to use special forensics software to retrieve data from some of the hard drives, others contained sensitive data in the clear, having never been overwritten or erased. The data included personal documents, financial information, e-mails, DNS server information and photographs.

"The average person who knows anything about computers could plug in these disks and just go surfing," Kessler said. "I know they found a guy's foot fetish on one disk. He'd been downloading loads and loads of stuff on feet. With what we got on that disk -- his name, address and all of his contacts -- it would have been extremely embarrassing if we were somebody who wanted to blackmail him."

Kessler said his company specifically avoided buying drives whose sellers indicated they'd been erased.

Kessler International broke down the kind of data it retrieved this way: Personal and confidential documents, including financial information, (36%); e-mails, (21%); photos, (13%); corporate documents, (11%); Web browsing histories, (11%); DNS server information, (4%); Miscellaneous data, (4%).

"We were more concerned with searching for people's identification, which is what we found, but we were surprised by all the corporate spreadsheets and business finance records we found," Kessler said.

The forensics firm even found one company's "secret" French fries recipe, Kessler said.

In recent years, hard drives have shown up on eBay that contain all kinds of sensitive data. In April 2006, Idaho Power Co. learned that drives it thought had been recycled had actually been sold on eBay with data still intact. The Boise, Idaho-based utility had used the drives in servers; when bought on eBay, they still contained proprietary corporate information such as memos, customer correspondence and confidential employee information.

well i think it may be true for all sites that sell old HDDs … it may contain personal information … and i think for this user may need something more then just disk formatting tool say … drive scrubber ?? … which can even re-write tracks and sectors of HDD which makes almost impossible to recover data from formatted HDD !!!

 

Njoy … fingerscrossed

Sunday, January 25, 2009

$ 236 million fine for spamming !!!

· 0 comments

 

First of all , before digging much deep we need to understand what is spamming …. well standard definition of Spam is the abuse of electronic messaging systems to indiscriminately send unsolicited bulk messages , in terms of computer terminology of course … Spam is the same thing many times. It originally appeared as a term to describe EMP (Excessive Multi Posting) and ECP (Excessive Cross Posting) on USENET. It is also used to describe UBE (Unsolicited Bulk E-mail) and UCE (Unsolicited Commercial E-mail)…

The term spam is said to come from a Monty Python skit from the second series of Monty Python's Flying Circus. In this skit, Vikings sing a chorus about spam while a woman tries to get something to eat that doesn't contain spam. Much like our attempts to limit the amount of UBE that comes into our mailboxes, she was unsuccessful in getting a meal that doesn't contain spam…

then you will ask , What is wrong with mass mailing ? right ?? well simple explanation to this question is … the Internet was set up so people could exchange information. Commercial use of the 'net' was frowned upon. In the last few years, the use was expanded by the World Wide Web to include commercial uses. The Web does not force you to receive Web advertisements; you choose what Web sites you care to visit. Spammers feel it is their right to send advertisements you don't want. They impose upon your rights to receive what you want. The constant barrage of unwanted, and sometimes offensive, advertisements is objectionable to many families that use the net. On the practical side, spam, a form of net abuse, costs you, the user. The problem with spam is that you pay for it. Whenever a spammer sends his e-mail to you, your ISP has to store the junk on the server until you download it. Also,the Internet is International. All countries of the world do not have unlimited access to the Internet either with their phone systems, or their service provider. Many countries' phone systems charge by the minute. In the US, there are some areas that charge this way also. When a spammer sends his message to those without unmetered service they pay to download it.

So , by all manner , SPAMMING is bad thing and illegal by law too …

Recently , a US couple who sent vast quantities of spam via a small ISP for around four months in 2003 have been fined a whacking $236 million.

According to the IDG newswire, Perez and Suzanne Bartok used a bulk emailing package to send millions of spammed messages to CIS Internet Services in Iowa.
The small ISP said it had to dedicate three servers to blocking the couple's spam, which amounted to an astonishing 500 million emails every day for around four months in 2003.

"There were millions of e-mails being delivered to us for each spam campaign to users that didn't exist on our servers,"
said the ISP's big cheese in an interview.
Interestingly, CIS is reported to have won judgments against 10 spammers to date, and other ISPs are watching with interest.
The bad news is that the Bartok's assets probably don't come anywhere near $236 million, so the lawsuit seems to have been academic...

news from , ITProportal.com

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Internet Web has been finally connected !!!

· 0 comments

It sounds a bit weird right ?? … but if you are into heavy internet use then you must have always felt that there is something missing in internet … still internet is not convenient … still doesn’t have all-in-one web service … right ??

For example , You’re writing an email to invite a friend to meet at a local San Francisco restaurant that neither of you has been to. You’d like to include a map. Today, this involves the disjointed tasks of message composition on a web-mail service, mapping the address on a map site, searching for reviews on the restaurant on a search engine, and finally copying all links into the message being composed. This familiar sequence is an awful lot of clicking, typing, searching, copying, and pasting in order to do a very simple task. And you haven’t even really sent a map or useful reviews—only links to them. This kind of clunky, time-consuming interaction is common on the Web, because there’s no easy way other than copy-and-paste to get your data between one web-application and another. Its kind of advanced Mashup , a web 2 replacement of Portal .. right ???



Ubiquity for Firefox from Aza Raskin on Vimeo.

I found something amazing research is going on at Mozilla Labs , they call it , Ubiquity … an application / add-on to firefox that will connect and allow users to use many different web services and combine them together !!! its still in beta phase , but it really looks promising to me … smile_tongue ( i am not critic , so please don’t consider my words seriously ) … Mozilla Labs define ubiquity as ,

  • Make it extremely easy to Extend browser functionality, and share new functionality with other users.
  • Enable on-demand, user-generated mashups with existing open Web APIs. (In other words, allowing everyone–not just Web developers–to remix the Web so it fits their needs, no matter what page they are on, or what they are doing.)
  • Empower users to control the web browser using a natural-language-like command interface. (With search, users type what they want to find. With Ubiquity, they type what they want to do.)
  • Use Trust networks and social constructs to balance security with ease of extensibility.

but i should say , it requires a bit of advance computer knowledge , because to perform any task you are required to write down certain commands which you have to remember smile_zipit …

Njoy …

Monday, January 12, 2009

History of Internet !!!

· 0 comments

Take a look at animation which describes history of internet ...




History of the Internet from PICOL on Vimeo.

nice work ...

Njoy ...

Friday, January 9, 2009

WINDOWS 7 for DOWNLOAD

· 0 comments

Microsoft’s well praised baby …… Windows 7 will be available for download publically by today on 9th of January … obviously it’s a BETA edition … but according to reviews this new OS will be Rocking …

From Official Windows 7 Blog …

On January 9th, the Windows 7 Beta will be available for Windows enthusiasts to download via the Windows 7 page on Windows.com. The Windows 7 Beta is going to be available download-only (we’re not sending out physical media) and available for a limited time to the first 2.5 million people who download the beta.

The Windows 7 Beta will be available in English, German, Japanese, Arabic, and Hindi, and each language will be available in 32-bit and 64-bit versions (except Hindi which will only be available in 32-bit). Because the Windows 7 Beta will be offered download-only, it will be provided to you as an ISO image (an .iso file) that you download. After downloading either the 32-bit or 64-bit ISO image of the Windows 7 Beta, you will be required to burn the ISO image to a DVD to install Windows 7. So you want to be sure you have a DVD burner before spending the time downloading the ISO image.

To burn the ISO image of the Windows 7 Beta to DVD, if your PC comes with Nero or Roxio products – you should be able to burn the ISO image to DVD. If you don’t already have DVD burning software on your PC, you can also check out ImgBurn which is free and can be downloaded here.

The Windows 7 Beta only supports Windows Vista SP1 to Windows 7 upgrades. So if you intend to do an upgrade – be sure it is on a PC running Windows Vista with Service Pack 1. We are not yet announcing anything regarding finalized upgrade paths for Windows 7.

The Windows 7 Beta will be only available in one edition, which is roughly equivalent the Ultimate edition of Windows Vista.

Also, another important thing to keep in mind is that the Windows 7 Beta will expire on August 1st, 2009.

I also need to emphasize that this is a beta of an unreleased operating system. Be sure to backup all your important data. As much as the Windows 7 Beta completely rocks, part of the beta process is discovering bugs and reporting those bugs. Some of those bugs could possibly lead to data loss. I tend to be a risk-taker myself and have gone all-out with the Windows 7 Beta by putting it on almost all my PCs both at work and at home, but not everyone should do this. I recommend using Windows Vista’s Backup and Restore features to ensure your information is backed up before trying out the Windows 7 Beta. Click here for several methods of backing up your data in Windows Vista.

Just can’t wait to have my own copy …

Njoy …

Thursday, January 8, 2009

So Safe Linux ... is not much safe now ???

· 0 comments

There seems to be a false sense of security among some Linux users. The number of malicious programs specifically written for GNU/Linux has been on the increase in recent years and in the year of 2005 alone has more than doubled: from 422 to 863. Some security consultants will argue that Linux has fewer viruses/malwares because it is less attractive as a target for having a smaller user base (compare ~90.66% Windows vs ~0.93% Linux). You may call me a traitor but I agree with that assessment. There is no reason why we will not see a rise of malware designed for Linux as it becomes more mainstream among ordinary users.

I’ve heard so many times from beginners “do I need an anti-virus?”, “Linux has no viruses”, “There’s no way a virus could infect a Linux box”. This is the false sense of security that many new Linux users are dealing with today. Most are just starting out as Linux users and have no idea about the risks and safe actions to take. Newbie Linux users tends to feel safe with statements they read about how the Linux OS could never be infected and if so could never be executed because of the way files works under Linux.


Linux does have its share of viruses, trojans and worms but would the Linux infected binaries really need to be exclusively executed by root for a major system apocalypse? Although in most cases the system programs are owned by root and the user is just running the program from a non-privileged account. Some people will argue that for a system wide infection, the infected binary would have to be derived exclusively from root and as a non-privileged user, by running an infected program would only effect the users /home directory and not a system wide infection.

There is a method to infect a system wide Linux OS without the need to become root, this procedure is a commonly known as “Privilege escalation” –

“Privilege escalation is the act of exploiting a bug or design fault in a software application to gain access to resources which normally would have been protected from an application or user. The result is that the application performs actions with more privileges than intended by the application developer or system administrator” (Privilege escalation).


Its not very likely that Linux malwares will ever compare to that of the Windows viruses and even more unlikely that Linux will ever see its share of the same issues with malware as the Windows operating system. If you take into consideration the email-borne viruses that Microsoft has, they are all executable and are in most cases executed by the user, whereas with Linux you would have to save the file make the file executable and manually run the file. Windows XP automatically makes the first named user an administrator, with the power to do anything to the system. Linux on the other hand uses the first named user as the root administrator but does not allow root login on boot-up.

As a Linux user, using the repositories, md5 checksums and using root privileges only when necessary are just a few ways to to guard against an intrusion. SSH is often the first point of entry to a Linux system but it’s not the last line of defense. Using a strong password and anti-virus software should always be common practice for any OS and could potentially limit the risk of a system catastrophe.

Njoy ...

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Malicious Tune ???

· 0 comments

We already know that malwares can be spread via , PDF files or by rouge flash player .. right ?? .. but the new most recent way to infect computer is using WMA ... windows media audio format music file ?? ... its hard to imagine right ?? , but if you have ever noticed ... sometimes media player asks user to download codecs or to agree some sort of licences ... and its quite common ....

But in October this year, for example, the biggest threat found by Kaspersky Lab was a Trojan Downloader named WMA Wimad.n - a Trojan masquerading as a WMA file. The Kaspersky advice is if you open a music file and your media player asks you to download a codec or read a licence agreement, don't.

So if in future you get any music file ... better make sure that its playing correct tune ...

Njoy ...

Supporting the Cause

Creative Commons

Translate into your Language

New Day New Giveaway

Powered By Blogger